ANWAR AHMAD vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — WPPIL/77/2026
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 12th June 2026.
CNR: UKHC010097872026
Filing Number
WPPIL/5106/2026
Filing Date
04-Jun-2026
Registration No
WPPIL/77/2026
Registration Date
04-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )
Sub-Category
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION ( 45 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
12-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 13-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ANWAR AHMAD
Adv. ALTAF HUSSAIN
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
-
2.DISTRICT MAGISTRATE
Adv. C.S.C.
-
3.SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE
Adv. C.S.C.
-
4.TEHSILDAR
Adv. C.S.C.
-
5.HASEENA
-
6.IMRAN
-
7.RIJWAN
-
8.GULFAM
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash UpadhyayView PDF
The High Court of Uttarakhand disposed of a PIL filed by Anwar Ahmad seeking removal of encroachments on government land (0.203 and 0.278 hectares) in Rudrapur that blocked public pathways. Finding that the State had already constituted a committee for site demarcation and committed to removing any encroachments discovered, the court declined to issue further directions, merely observing that action be taken strictly in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Jun-2026
Fresh Cases As Defective -236
Registrar (Judicial)
-
04-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPPIL/77/2026
The High Court of Uttarakhand disposed of a PIL filed by Anwar Ahmad seeking removal of encroachments on government land (0.203 and 0.278 hectares) in Rudrapur that blocked public pathways. Finding that the State had already constituted a committee for site demarcation and committed to removing any encroachments discovered, the court declined to issue further directions, merely observing that action be taken strictly in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts