ANWAR AHMAD vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — WPPIL/77/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 12th June 2026.

CNR: UKHC010097872026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WPPIL/5106/2026

Filing Date

04-06-2026

Registration No

WPPIL/77/2026

Registration Date

04-06-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION ( 45 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

12th June 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

ANWAR AHMAD

Adv. ALTAF HUSSAIN

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

Adv. C.S.C.

SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE

Adv. C.S.C.

TEHSILDAR

Adv. C.S.C.

HASEENA

IMRAN

RIJWAN

GULFAM

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

05-06-2026

FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236

Orders

12-06-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

The High Court of Uttarakhand disposed of a PIL filed by Anwar Ahmad seeking removal of encroachments on government land (0.203 and 0.278 hectares) in Rudrapur that blocked public pathways. Finding that the State had already constituted a committee for site demarcation and committed to removing any encroachments discovered, the court declined to issue further directions, merely observing that action be taken strictly in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Uttarakhand disposed of a PIL filed by Anwar Ahmad seeking removal of encroachments on government land (0.203 and 0.278 hectares) in Rudrapur that blocked public pathways. Finding that the State had already constituted a committee for site demarcation and committed to removing any encroachments discovered, the court declined to issue further directions, merely observing that action be taken strictly in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case