SUBHASH CHANDRA PANDEY vs CHITRA PANDEY — CRLR/423/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 144. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: UKHC010097732026

Filing Number

CRLR/4680/2026

Filing Date

03-Jun-2026

Registration No

CRLR/423/2026

Registration Date

03-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

REVISIONS ( 4 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 144

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUBHASH CHANDRA PANDEY

    Adv. GANESH KANDPAL,GULSHAN PANDEY,GULSHAN PANDEY, ,GULSHAN PANDEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CHITRA PANDEY

  2. 2.MASTER ISHAN PANDEY

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF

    Case Summary: CRLR/423/2026 Subhash Chandra Pandey's criminal revision challenging a Family Court's interim maintenance order (₹30,000/month total) was partially allowed. The High Court stayed the lower court's order and reduced interim maintenance to ₹20,000/month (₹8,000 for wife, ₹12,000 for minor son) pending final hearing, finding the original assessment of the retired Army officer's ₹44,003 monthly pension as excessive. Notice issued to respondents; case listed for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

  4. 05-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF

  5. 05-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 03-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLR/423/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRLR/423/2026 Subhash Chandra Pandey's criminal revision challenging a Family Court's interim maintenance order (₹30,000/month total) was partially allowed. The High Court stayed the lower court's order and reduced interim maintenance to ₹20,000/month (₹8,000 for wife, ₹12,000 for minor son) pending final hearing, finding the original assessment of the retired Army officer's ₹44,003 monthly pension as excessive. Notice issued to respondents; case listed for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case