GANESH SINGH KATHAIT vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — WPMS/1746/2026

Case under Under Article 227 of the Constituion of India Section 227. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 09th June 2026.

CNR: UKHC010097652026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WPMS/5088/2026

Filing Date

03-06-2026

Registration No

WPMS/1746/2026

Registration Date

03-06-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

AGAINST THE ORDER OF CIVIL COURT ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

09th June 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

Under Article 227 of the Constituion of India Section 227

Petitioner(s)

GANESH SINGH KATHAIT

Adv. DEEPAK PETSHALI

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

Adv. C.S.C.

RETURNING OFFICER

Adv. SANJAY BHATT

RINKI NAUTIYAL

OMKAR NAUTIYAL

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

08-06-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

09-06-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

09-06-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

The court dismissed Ganesh Singh Kathait's writ petition challenging the District Judge's order that rejected his application to be struck off as a party from an election petition filed against his wife. The court held that questions regarding whether the petitioner or his family members encroached on public land must be determined by the Election Tribunal, and therefore the petitioner's name could not be removed from the proceedings based solely on a Tehsildar's report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed Ganesh Singh Kathait's writ petition challenging the District Judge's order that rejected his application to be struck off as a party from an election petition filed against his wife. The court held that questions regarding whether the petitioner or his family members encroached on public land must be determined by the Election Tribunal, and therefore the petitioner's name could not be removed from the proceedings based solely on a Tehsildar's report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case