VINOD KATHAIT vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — WPMS/1744/2026

Case under Under Article 227 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 09th June 2026.

CNR: UKHC010097632026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WPMS/5086/2026

Filing Date

03-06-2026

Registration No

WPMS/1744/2026

Registration Date

03-06-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

AGAINST THE ORDER OF CIVIL COURT ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

09th June 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

Under Article 227 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

VINOD KATHAIT

Adv. DEEPAK PETSHALI

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

Adv. C.S.C.

RETURNING OFFICER

Adv. SANJAY BHATT

RINKI NAUTIYAL

OMKAR NAUTIYAL

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

08-06-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

09-06-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

09-06-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the District Judge's order that rejected the petitioner's application to be struck off from an election petition filed against his wife. The court held that whether the petitioner or his family encroached on government land is a substantive question for the Election Tribunal to determine, and therefore the petitioner's name could not be removed based solely on a Tehsildar's report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the District Judge's order that rejected the petitioner's application to be struck off from an election petition filed against his wife. The court held that whether the petitioner or his family encroached on government land is a substantive question for the Election Tribunal to determine, and therefore the petitioner's name could not be removed based solely on a Tehsildar's report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case