MS PATNI ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — WPMB/463/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: UKHC010097222026

Next Hearing

: -

Filing Number

WPMB/5069/2026

Filing Date

03-06-2026

Registration No

WPMB/463/2026

Registration Date

03-06-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

WRIT PETITION RELATING TO CONTRACT/TENDER MATTER ( 23 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

MS PATNI ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION

Adv. ABHIJAY NEGI,SNIGDHA TIWARI,SNIGDHA TIWARI, ,AYUSH POKHRIYAL,SNIGDHA TIWARI

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER

Adv. C.S.C.

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

Adv. C.S.C.

M/S NEERAJ MISHRA

M/S GANGA PRASAD PUNETHA

M/S TARA DUTT PALARIYA

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

05-06-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

12-06-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Case Summary: WPMB/463/2026 The petition filed by Ms Patni Engineering and Construction against the State of Uttarakhand was adjourned. The case was ordered to be connected and listed along with WPMB No. 444 of 2026 on the date fixed in that case. Meanwhile, the respondents were directed to obtain instructions and file a counter affidavit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPMB/463/2026 The petition filed by Ms Patni Engineering and Construction against the State of Uttarakhand was adjourned. The case was ordered to be connected and listed along with WPMB No. 444 of 2026 on the date fixed in that case. Meanwhile, the respondents were directed to obtain instructions and file a counter affidavit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case