MUSKAN vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — WPCRL/1038/2026
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
CNR: UKHC010096972026
Filing Number
WPCRL/4638/2026
Filing Date
03-Jun-2026
Registration No
WPCRL/1038/2026
Registration Date
03-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )
Sub-Category
CRIMINAL WRIT FOR PROTECTION ( 6 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MUSKAN
Adv. KHUSHI CHAUDHARY
-
2.MOHD. RAJA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
-
2.SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
Adv. G.A.
-
3.S.H.O
Adv. G.A.
-
4.SHAFIQ
-
5.ABID
-
6.SHAMIM
-
7.DILSHAD
-
8.SAMREEN
Case History
-
11-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
11-Jun-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
-
04-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF
-
04-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF
Case Summary: WPCRL/1038/2026 Petitioner Muskan sought protection from her family after marrying Mohd. Raja on 20.04.2026. The court found conflicting documents regarding her age—Aadhaar Card showing 01.01.2008 (making her 18+ at marriage) versus birth certificate and school records showing 10.02.2010 (making her 16 at marriage). The petition was partially allowed: Petitioner No. 1 was directed to be placed in a government shelter home pending verification of her age per the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015; Petitioner No. 2 (the husband, a major) was granted police protection from interference. The case was adjourned to 11.06.2026 for age verification completion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPCRL/1038/2026
Case Summary: WPCRL/1038/2026 Petitioner Muskan sought protection from her family after marrying Mohd. Raja on 20.04.2026. The court found conflicting documents regarding her age—Aadhaar Card showing 01.01.2008 (making her 18+ at marriage) versus birth certificate and school records showing 10.02.2010 (making her 16 at marriage). The petition was partially allowed: Petitioner No. 1 was directed to be placed in a government shelter home pending verification of her age per the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015; Petitioner No. 2 (the husband, a major) was granted police protection from interference. The case was adjourned to 11.06.2026 for age verification completion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts