NASEEM AND ORS vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — WPCRL/1034/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109(1),190,191(2),191(3),352. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 18th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010096402026

Filing Number

WPCRL/4622/2026

Filing Date

02-Jun-2026

Registration No

WPCRL/1034/2026

Registration Date

02-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

FIR QUASHING ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

18-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109(1),190,191(2),191(3),352

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NASEEM AND ORS

    Adv. DEVANSHI JOSHI,VIVEK PATHAK,VIVEK PATHAK, ,VIVEK PATHAK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.STATION HOUSE OFFICER

    Adv. G.A.

  3. 3.TAMREZ ALI

    Adv. D C S RAWAT

  4. 4.JAVED

    Adv. D C S RAWAT

  5. 5.ZUNAID

    Adv. D C S RAWAT,HARSHIT BISHT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF

    The court quashed FIR Crime No. 13 of 2026 against Naseem and others for alleged attack with agricultural equipment causing injuries, after both parties reached an amicable settlement. The court accepted the compounding application, holding that continuation of proceedings would be oppressive when conviction chances are remote and parties desire peace. A condition of Rs. 75,000 payment to the Bar Association within 24 hours was imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases As Defective -236

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

  4. 04-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 02-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPCRL/1034/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court quashed FIR Crime No. 13 of 2026 against Naseem and others for alleged attack with agricultural equipment causing injuries, after both parties reached an amicable settlement. The court accepted the compounding application, holding that continuation of proceedings would be oppressive when conviction chances are remote and parties desire peace. A condition of Rs. 75,000 payment to the Bar Association within 24 hours was imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case