MANAGING DIRECTOR COMMISSIONER vs NEELIMA SHARMA — WPSB/321/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: UKHC010096182026

Filing Number

WPSB/5004/2026

Filing Date

02-Jun-2026

Registration No

WPSB/321/2026

Registration Date

02-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )

Sub-Category

AGAINST PUBLIC SERVICE TRIBUNAL ( 19 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANAGING DIRECTOR COMMISSIONER

    Adv. ASHISH JOSHI

  2. 2.FINANCIAL CONTROLLER

  3. 3.GENERAL MANAGER

  4. 4.DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NEELIMA SHARMA

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash UpadhyayView PDF

    Case Summary: WPSB No. 321/2026 The court issued notice to respondent Neelima Sharma via speed post and directed her to file a counter affidavit by the next date. The court placed the Tribunal order's operation in abeyance until the next hearing, noting that the petitioner's claim for interest was barred under Explanation V to Section 11 CPC based on a prior court order from June 2022. The case was adjourned for further hearing after service of notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

  4. 02-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPSB/321/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPSB No. 321/2026 The court issued notice to respondent Neelima Sharma via speed post and directed her to file a counter affidavit by the next date. The court placed the Tribunal order's operation in abeyance until the next hearing, noting that the petitioner's claim for interest was barred under Explanation V to Section 11 CPC based on a prior court order from June 2022. The case was adjourned for further hearing after service of notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case