RAMPAL vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/1241/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 03rd June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010095892026

Filing Number

C528/4600/2026

Filing Date

01-Jun-2026

Registration No

C528/1241/2026

Registration Date

01-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF OTHER COMPLAINT CASE ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

03-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMPAL

    Adv. VIKAS ANAND,GYAN MATI KUSHWAHA,GYAN MATI KUSHWAHA, ,ZEBA NAAZ,GYAN MATI KUSHWAHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.SH. HARSHAVARDHAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 03-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF

    Case Summary: C528/1241/2026 - RAMPAL v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND The court granted temporary relief to applicant Rampal, who was facing a POCSO trial. After Rampal's non-appearance on the judgment date (12.03.2026), non-bailable warrants were issued against him, while his co-accused were acquitted. The court held that Rampal deserved one opportunity to explain his absence and appear before the trial court, noting that subjecting him to immediate coercive action served no useful purpose when he expressed willingness to appear. Decision: The non-bailable warrants' operation was suspended until 11.06.2026, with directions for Rampal to positively appear on that date. If he fails to appear, the suspension automatically ceases and normal proceedings resume. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 03-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

  4. 01-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. C528/1241/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C528/1241/2026 - RAMPAL v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND The court granted temporary relief to applicant Rampal, who was facing a POCSO trial. After Rampal's non-appearance on the judgment date (12.03.2026), non-bailable warrants were issued against him, while his co-accused were acquitted. The court held that Rampal deserved one opportunity to explain his absence and appear before the trial court, noting that subjecting him to immediate coercive action served no useful purpose when he expressed willingness to appear. Decision: The non-bailable warrants' operation was suspended until 11.06.2026, with directions for Rampal to positively appear on that date. If he fails to appear, the suspension automatically ceases and normal proceedings resume. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case