ROORKEE BUSINESS SCHOOL PRAHLADPUR vs SRI DEV SUMAN UTTARAKHAND UNIVERSITY Advocate - TUSHAR UPADHYAYA — WPMS/1715/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: UKHC010095782026

Next Hearing

: -

Filing Number

WPMS/4988/2026

Filing Date

01-06-2026

Registration No

WPMS/1715/2026

Registration Date

01-06-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

MISC MATTERS ( 47 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

ROORKEE BUSINESS SCHOOL PRAHLADPUR

Adv. DR GOVIND SINGH LATWAL,CHANDRA SHEKHAR JOSHI,CHANDRA SHEKHAR JOSHI, ,CHANDRA SHEKHAR JOSHI

Respondent(s)

SRI DEV SUMAN UTTARAKHAND UNIVERSITY Advocate - TUSHAR UPADHYAYA

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

Adv. C.S.C.

DIRECTOR

Adv. C.S.C.

SECRETARY TO THE CHANCELLOR

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

03-06-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

03-06-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Case Summary: WPMS 1715/2026 The court granted interim protection to Roorkee Business School Prahladpur against Sri Dev Suman Uttarakhand University's imposition of security deposits (Rs.35 lakh for professional courses, Rs.15 lakh for non-professional courses), finding the deposits likely inapplicable under the 2016 Government Order. The court prohibited collection of security deposits until final disposal of the petition and directed respondents to file counter-affidavits within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPMS 1715/2026 The court granted interim protection to Roorkee Business School Prahladpur against Sri Dev Suman Uttarakhand University's imposition of security deposits (Rs.35 lakh for professional courses, Rs.15 lakh for non-professional courses), finding the deposits likely inapplicable under the 2016 Government Order. The court prohibited collection of security deposits until final disposal of the petition and directed respondents to file counter-affidavits within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case