MS STAR MEDICAL STOR vs THE STATE TAX OFFICER Advocate - C.S.C. — WPMB/451/2026
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 03rd June 2026.
CNR: UKHC010095622026
Filing Number
WPMB/4986/2026
Filing Date
01-Jun-2026
Registration No
WPMB/451/2026
Registration Date
01-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )
Sub-Category
GOODS AND SERVICE TAX ACT ( 48 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
03-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MS STAR MEDICAL STOR
Adv. PANKAJ TIWARI
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE TAX OFFICER Advocate - C.S.C.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
03-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash UpadhyayView PDF
Case Summary: WPMB/451/2026 - MS Star Medical Stor v. The Assistant Commissioner, State GST The High Court of Uttarakhand quashed the GST Assessment Order against M/s Star Medical Stor, finding procedural violation of natural justice. The court held that scheduling the personal hearing date 14 days before the reply submission deadline rendered the hearing illusory and non-compliant with prescribed procedure. The matter was remitted to the Adjudicating Officer to recommence from the show cause notice stage with a properly fixed personal hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Jun-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
-
01-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPMB/451/2026
Case Summary: WPMB/451/2026 - MS Star Medical Stor v. The Assistant Commissioner, State GST The High Court of Uttarakhand quashed the GST Assessment Order against M/s Star Medical Stor, finding procedural violation of natural justice. The court held that scheduling the personal hearing date 14 days before the reply submission deadline rendered the hearing illusory and non-compliant with prescribed procedure. The matter was remitted to the Adjudicating Officer to recommence from the show cause notice stage with a properly fixed personal hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts