MS STAR MEDICAL STOR vs THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER — WPMB/449/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 03rd June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010095482026

Filing Number

WPMB/4979/2026

Filing Date

01-Jun-2026

Registration No

WPMB/449/2026

Registration Date

01-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

GOODS AND SERVICE TAX ACT ( 48 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

03-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MS STAR MEDICAL STOR

    Adv. PANKAJ TIWARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 03-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash UpadhyayView PDF

    Summary of WPMB/449/2026 The High Court of Uttarakhand quashed the GST assessment order against M/s Star Medical Stor, finding that the Assistant Commissioner violated natural justice by scheduling the personal hearing 9 days before the reply submission deadline, rendering the hearing illusory and procedurally invalid. The court remitted the matter back to the Adjudicating Officer to restart proceedings from the show cause notice stage with a properly scheduled hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 03-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

  4. 01-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPMB/449/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of WPMB/449/2026 The High Court of Uttarakhand quashed the GST assessment order against M/s Star Medical Stor, finding that the Assistant Commissioner violated natural justice by scheduling the personal hearing 9 days before the reply submission deadline, rendering the hearing illusory and procedurally invalid. The court remitted the matter back to the Adjudicating Officer to restart proceedings from the show cause notice stage with a properly scheduled hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case