KAMAL SINGH RAWAT vs SHAILESH CHANDRA — WPMS/1701/2026
Case under Under Article 227 of the Constituion of India Section 227. Next hearing: 14th July 2026.
CNR: UKHC010095182026
Next Hearing
14th July 2026
Filing Number
WPMS/4957/2026
Filing Date
01-06-2026
Registration No
WPMS/1701/2026
Registration Date
01-06-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )
Sub-Category
AGAINST THE ORDER OF CIVIL COURT ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KAMAL SINGH RAWAT
Adv. BIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI
Respondent(s)
SHAILESH CHANDRA
DISTRICT ELECTION OFFICER
RETURNING OFFICER
ASHOK SINGH
STATE GOVERNMENT THROUGH COLLECTOR
Adv. C.S.C.
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari
FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 03-06-2026 | FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236 |
| 14-07-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
Orders
Case Summary: WPMS/1701/2026 Petitioner: Kamal Singh Rawat Respondents: Shailesh Chandra, District Election Officer, Returning Officer Outcome: Case adjourned to 14.07.2026 for disposal. The court granted an interim stay on the District Judge's order (dated 12.05.2026) that had set aside Rawat's election as Zila Panchayat Member. The court found prima facie error in the lower court's decision to allow the election challenge without examining the Returning Officer as a witness, despite his categorical denial of allegations regarding ballot discrepancies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WPMS/1701/2026 Petitioner: Kamal Singh Rawat Respondents: Shailesh Chandra, District Election Officer, Returning Officer Outcome: Case adjourned to 14.07.2026 for disposal. The court granted an interim stay on the District Judge's order (dated 12.05.2026) that had set aside Rawat's election as Zila Panchayat Member. The court found prima facie error in the lower court's decision to allow the election challenge without examining the Returning Officer as a witness, despite his categorical denial of allegations regarding ballot discrepancies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts