KAMINI CHOPRA vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/1222/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 120B,406,420. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: UKHC010094952026

Next Hearing

: -

Filing Number

C528/4548/2026

Filing Date

01-06-2026

Registration No

C528/1222/2026

Registration Date

01-06-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF POLICE CHALLANI CASES ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 120B,406,420

Petitioner(s)

KAMINI CHOPRA

Adv. PIYUSH GARG

SRI CHAHAT CHOPRA

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

STATION HOUSE OFFICER

Adv. G.A.

SRI BALVEER SINGH NEGI

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

03-06-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

03-06-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Case Summary: C528/1222/2026 Kamini Chopra and Sri Chahat Chopra filed a petition challenging an FIR lodged by Balveer Singh Negi alleging cheating over a failed property sale agreement for ₹2,13,50,000 at Rishikesh. The applicants argued the dispute is purely contractual and not criminal in nature. The court issued notice to respondent no.3, stayed further criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No.297 of 2025) pending before the lower court, and adjourned the matter for next listing after service report receipt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C528/1222/2026 Kamini Chopra and Sri Chahat Chopra filed a petition challenging an FIR lodged by Balveer Singh Negi alleging cheating over a failed property sale agreement for ₹2,13,50,000 at Rishikesh. The applicants argued the dispute is purely contractual and not criminal in nature. The court issued notice to respondent no.3, stayed further criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No.297 of 2025) pending before the lower court, and adjourned the matter for next listing after service report receipt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case