SANTOSHI DEVI vs LT COL GANESH JOSHI — CLCON/316/2026

Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (Act No. 70 of 1971) Section 12. Disposed: Contested--CLOSED on 10th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010094902026

Filing Number

CLCON/4944/2026

Filing Date

01-Jun-2026

Registration No

CLCON/316/2026

Registration Date

01-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CONTEMPT ( 6 )

Sub-Category

AGAINST FINAL ORDER ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

10-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--CLOSED

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (Act No. 70 of 1971) Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANTOSHI DEVI

    Adv. SURYAKANT MAITHANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LT COL GANESH JOSHI

  2. 2.UNION OF INDIA

    Adv. DEPUTY S.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

    In this contempt petition, Justice Pankaj Purohit closed the proceedings after finding that the Competent Authority had decided Santoshi Devi's representation on 04.04.2026, complying with the Writ Court's order dated 17.11.2025 which mandated a decision within six months. The court held that since the representation had been decided pursuant to the earlier Writ Court order, the petitioner remains free to challenge that decision through appropriate legal proceedings, rendering the contempt petition moot. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

  4. 03-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh ThapliyalView PDF

  5. 03-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 01-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CLCON/316/2026

casestatus.in Summary

In this contempt petition, Justice Pankaj Purohit closed the proceedings after finding that the Competent Authority had decided Santoshi Devi's representation on 04.04.2026, complying with the Writ Court's order dated 17.11.2025 which mandated a decision within six months. The court held that since the representation had been decided pursuant to the earlier Writ Court order, the petitioner remains free to challenge that decision through appropriate legal proceedings, rendering the contempt petition moot. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case