DASHRATH SINGH RAWAT vs SATYAJIT MOHANTY — CLCON/314/2026
Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (Act No. 70 of 1971) Section 12. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 10th June 2026.
CNR: UKHC010093802026
Filing Number
CLCON/4883/2026
Filing Date
30-May-2026
Registration No
CLCON/314/2026
Registration Date
30-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CONTEMPT ( 6 )
Sub-Category
AGAINST FINAL ORDER ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
10-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DASHRATH SINGH RAWAT
Adv. SHUBHANG DOBHAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.SATYAJIT MOHANTY
-
2.MR NEERAJ KUMAR PATHAK
-
3.COL HEM CHANDRA SINGH
-
4.PARVEEN KUMAR REGISTRAR NIM
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF
Case Summary: CLCON/314/2026 The court found the Joint Director D(HMI) in contempt for reiteration of an order dated 02.08.2024 that had been previously set aside by the court's order dated 21.04.2026. The court disposed of the contempt petition and directed the Competent Authority to pass a fresh order based on reconsideration of the matter within three weeks, rather than merely reiterating the earlier invalidated order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Jun-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
-
08-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF
-
04-Jun-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
-
02-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CLCON/314/2026
Case Summary: CLCON/314/2026 The court found the Joint Director D(HMI) in contempt for reiteration of an order dated 02.08.2024 that had been previously set aside by the court's order dated 21.04.2026. The court disposed of the contempt petition and directed the Competent Authority to pass a fresh order based on reconsideration of the matter within three weeks, rather than merely reiterating the earlier invalidated order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts