SAMEER TYAGI vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/1200/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 03rd June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010093742026

Filing Number

C528/4492/2026

Filing Date

30-May-2026

Registration No

C528/1200/2026

Registration Date

30-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF OTHER COMPLAINT CASE ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

03-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAMEER TYAGI

    Adv. SUNIL CHANDRA,KAILASH CHANDRA,KAILASH CHANDRA, ,KAILASH CHANDRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.MEGHA BOHRA TYAGI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 03-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF

    Case Summary: Hon'ble Justice Alok Mahra directed the Sessions Judge, Dehradun to expeditiously decide Sameer Tyagi's application for visitation rights with his minor daughter within three weeks and resolve Criminal Appeal No. 335 of 2025 within six weeks. The court emphasized that custody and visitation matters require urgent consideration due to their direct impact on child welfare, and prolonged delays cause avoidable prejudice to all parties, particularly the minor child. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases As Defective -236

    Registrar (Judicial)

  4. 30-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. C528/1200/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Hon'ble Justice Alok Mahra directed the Sessions Judge, Dehradun to expeditiously decide Sameer Tyagi's application for visitation rights with his minor daughter within three weeks and resolve Criminal Appeal No. 335 of 2025 within six weeks. The court emphasized that custody and visitation matters require urgent consideration due to their direct impact on child welfare, and prolonged delays cause avoidable prejudice to all parties, particularly the minor child. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case