SUNIL PANWAR vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C. — WPSB/313/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: UKHC010093612026

Next Hearing

: -

Filing Number

WPSB/4875/2026

Filing Date

29-05-2026

Registration No

WPSB/313/2026

Registration Date

29-05-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )

Sub-Category

SENIORITY ( 6 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

SUNIL PANWAR

Adv. RAKSHIT JOSHI,B D PANDE,B D PANDE, ,B D PANDE

DR RAMESH PAL SINGH CHAUHAN

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C.

DIRECTOR OF HIGHER EDUCATION

Adv. C.S.C.

VICE CHANCELLOR

Adv. DR. KARTIKEY HARI GUPTA

PRESIDENT

DR SHALINI GUPTA

Adv. ABHIJAY NEGI (FOR CAVEATOR),SNIGDHA TIWARI

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

01-06-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

01-06-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Case Summary: WPSB/313/2026 In this writ petition filed by Sunil Panwar and Dr. Ramesh Pal Singh Chauhan against the State of Uttarakhand and higher education officials, the court granted four weeks' time to the respondents to file counter affidavits. The case has been adjourned and listed for further hearing after the counter affidavits are filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPSB/313/2026 In this writ petition filed by Sunil Panwar and Dr. Ramesh Pal Singh Chauhan against the State of Uttarakhand and higher education officials, the court granted four weeks' time to the respondents to file counter affidavits. The case has been adjourned and listed for further hearing after the counter affidavits are filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case