MANJULA BANSAL vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/1197/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 164. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 01st June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010093582026

Filing Number

C528/4485/2026

Filing Date

29-May-2026

Registration No

C528/1197/2026

Registration Date

29-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF OTHER COMPLAINT CASE ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

01-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 164

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANJULA BANSAL

    Adv. PRABHA NAITHANI

  2. 2.KHWAAB BANSAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.SMT. UTTARA BANSAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF

    Case Summary: C528/1197/2026 The court disposed of the application filed by Manjula Bansal and Khwaab Bansal seeking to quash the Magistrate's Section 164 BNSS order and criminal proceedings against Uttara Bansal. The dispute involved an alleged property sale affecting the complainant's share. Since both parties agreed to expedite proceedings without objection, the court directed the City Magistrate, Dehradun to conclude the case within three months without unnecessary adjournments, finding this served the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

  4. 29-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. C528/1197/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C528/1197/2026 The court disposed of the application filed by Manjula Bansal and Khwaab Bansal seeking to quash the Magistrate's Section 164 BNSS order and criminal proceedings against Uttara Bansal. The dispute involved an alleged property sale affecting the complainant's share. Since both parties agreed to expedite proceedings without objection, the court directed the City Magistrate, Dehradun to conclude the case within three months without unnecessary adjournments, finding this served the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case