VIJENDRA vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C. — WPSS/1436/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 03rd June 2026.

CNR: UKHC010093542026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WPSS/4869/2026

Filing Date

29-05-2026

Registration No

WPSS/1436/2026

Registration Date

29-05-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )

Sub-Category

RELATING TO PAY AND ALLOWANCES ( 17 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

03rd June 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

VIJENDRA

Adv. HEM CHANDRA JOSHI

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C.

PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST

Adv. C.S.C.

DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER

Adv. C.S.C.

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

30-05-2026

FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236

Orders

03-06-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

The Uttarakhand High Court disposed of five consolidated writ petitions filed by daily wage forest workers seeking minimum pay scale with dearness allowance and arrears per the 7th Pay Commission. Rather than granting the relief sought, the court permitted petitioners to file fresh representations to the forest authority within two weeks, with a decision to follow within four weeks thereafter, and provided job protection for six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Uttarakhand High Court disposed of five consolidated writ petitions filed by daily wage forest workers seeking minimum pay scale with dearness allowance and arrears per the 7th Pay Commission. Rather than granting the relief sought, the court permitted petitioners to file fresh representations to the forest authority within two weeks, with a decision to follow within four weeks thereafter, and provided job protection for six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case