VIJENDRA vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C. — WPSS/1436/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 03rd June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010093542026

Filing Number

WPSS/4869/2026

Filing Date

29-May-2026

Registration No

WPSS/1436/2026

Registration Date

29-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )

Sub-Category

RELATING TO PAY AND ALLOWANCES ( 17 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

03-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIJENDRA

    Adv. HEM CHANDRA JOSHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C.

  2. 2.PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST

    Adv. C.S.C.

  3. 3.DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER

    Adv. C.S.C.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 03-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar TiwariView PDF

    The Uttarakhand High Court disposed of five consolidated writ petitions filed by daily wage forest workers seeking minimum pay scale with dearness allowance and arrears per the 7th Pay Commission. Rather than granting the relief sought, the court permitted petitioners to file fresh representations to the forest authority within two weeks, with a decision to follow within four weeks thereafter, and provided job protection for six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-May-2026

    Fresh Cases As Defective -236

    Registrar (Judicial)

  4. 29-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPSS/1436/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Uttarakhand High Court disposed of five consolidated writ petitions filed by daily wage forest workers seeking minimum pay scale with dearness allowance and arrears per the 7th Pay Commission. Rather than granting the relief sought, the court permitted petitioners to file fresh representations to the forest authority within two weeks, with a decision to follow within four weeks thereafter, and provided job protection for six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case