BHAJAN SINGH ALIAS RAJE SINGH vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — BA1/952/2026
Case under Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007 (Act No. 06 of 2007) Section 3/5/8. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 01st June 2026.
CNR: UKHC010093462026
Filing Number
BA1/4482/2026
Filing Date
29-05-2026
Registration No
BA1/952/2026
Registration Date
29-05-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
01st June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BHAJAN SINGH ALIAS RAJE SINGH
Adv. SHARIQ KHURSHID
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-06-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
Orders
Case Summary: Justice Ashish Naithani granted bail to Bhajan Singh alias Raje Singh in a case involving charges under the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act and Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act. The court found that the applicant was implicated solely based on a co-accused's disclosure statement, with no incriminating physical evidence, CCTV footage, or scientific evidence recovered. The State did not oppose bail. Singh was ordered released on personal bond and two reliable sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Justice Ashish Naithani granted bail to Bhajan Singh alias Raje Singh in a case involving charges under the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act and Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act. The court found that the applicant was implicated solely based on a co-accused's disclosure statement, with no incriminating physical evidence, CCTV footage, or scientific evidence recovered. The State did not oppose bail. Singh was ordered released on personal bond and two reliable sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts