VICKY KUMAR SHARMA vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — WPMS/1642/2026

Case under Under Article 227 of the Constituion of India Section 227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 10th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010093372026

Filing Number

WPMS/4861/2026

Filing Date

29-May-2026

Registration No

WPMS/1642/2026

Registration Date

29-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

AGAINST THE ORDER OF MISC MATTER ( 19 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

10-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 227 of the Constituion of India Section 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VICKY KUMAR SHARMA

    Adv. NAINA MITTAL,VAIBHAV SINGH CHAUHAN,VAIBHAV SINGH CHAUHAN, ,VAIBHAV SINGH CHAUHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

  2. 2.JAGNANDAN LAL

  3. 3.JAGDISH LAL

  4. 4.GRAM SABHA SUBHASH GADH

    Adv. ANJALI BHARGAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar TiwariView PDF

    The court dismissed Vicky Kumar Sharma's petition seeking expedited hearing of a partition suit filed in 2021 under Section 176 of the UPZA&LR Act before the Assistant Collector, Haridwar. The court reasoned that since many older cases remain pending before the same court, issuing a direction to prioritize this relatively recent suit would be inequitable. The petition was disposed with liberty for the petitioner to make a direct request to the concerned court for expeditious disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases As Defective -236

    Registrar (Judicial)

  4. 29-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPMS/1642/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed Vicky Kumar Sharma's petition seeking expedited hearing of a partition suit filed in 2021 under Section 176 of the UPZA&LR Act before the Assistant Collector, Haridwar. The court reasoned that since many older cases remain pending before the same court, issuing a direction to prioritize this relatively recent suit would be inequitable. The petition was disposed with liberty for the petitioner to make a direct request to the concerned court for expeditious disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case