RAJESH KUMAR vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — WPSS/1432/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 03rd June 2026.

CNR: UKHC010093262026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WPSS/4853/2026

Filing Date

29-05-2026

Registration No

WPSS/1432/2026

Registration Date

29-05-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )

Sub-Category

RELATING TO PAY AND ALLOWANCES ( 17 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

03rd June 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

RAJESH KUMAR

Adv. HEM CHANDRA JOSHI

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST

Adv. C.S.C.

DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER

Adv. C.S.C.

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

30-05-2026

FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236

Orders

03-06-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

The court disposed of five consolidated writ petitions by daily wage forest workers seeking minimum pay scale and arrears, allowing them to file fresh representations to the Divisional Forest Officer within two weeks. The competent authority must decide on these fresh representations within four weeks, and petitioners will not be disturbed in their employment for six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court disposed of five consolidated writ petitions by daily wage forest workers seeking minimum pay scale and arrears, allowing them to file fresh representations to the Divisional Forest Officer within two weeks. The competent authority must decide on these fresh representations within four weeks, and petitioners will not be disturbed in their employment for six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case