KAHKASHAN KHAN NAZ vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — WPSS/1426/2026
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 01st June 2026.
CNR: UKHC010093202026
Filing Number
WPSS/4850/2026
Filing Date
29-05-2026
Registration No
WPSS/1426/2026
Registration Date
29-05-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )
Sub-Category
APPOINTMENT ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
01st June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KAHKASHAN KHAN NAZ
Adv. NARENDRA BALI
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
DIRECTOR
Adv. C.S.C.
ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR
Adv. C.S.C.
CHIEF EDUCATION OFFICER
Adv. C.S.C.
DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER
Adv. C.S.C.
Orders
Case Summary: WPSS/1426/2026 Kahkashan Khan Naz v. State of Uttarakhand The High Court of Uttarakhand disposed of the petition with a direction to the District Education Officer (Primary Education), Dehradun to decide the petitioner's representation within 30 days. The petitioner, a 68% disabled candidate, had successfully cleared counseling and document verification for an Assistant Teacher (Primary) position under the disability quota but was denied the appointment letter without cause. With the State's consent, the court deferred the mandamus prayer to allow the administrative authority an opportunity to reconsider the representation filed by the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WPSS/1426/2026 Kahkashan Khan Naz v. State of Uttarakhand The High Court of Uttarakhand disposed of the petition with a direction to the District Education Officer (Primary Education), Dehradun to decide the petitioner's representation within 30 days. The petitioner, a 68% disabled candidate, had successfully cleared counseling and document verification for an Assistant Teacher (Primary) position under the disability quota but was denied the appointment letter without cause. With the State's consent, the court deferred the mandamus prayer to allow the administrative authority an opportunity to reconsider the representation filed by the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts