ARVIND KUMAR vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C. — WPSS/1428/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 01st June 2026.

CNR: UKHC010093182026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WPSS/4849/2026

Filing Date

29-05-2026

Registration No

WPSS/1428/2026

Registration Date

29-05-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )

Sub-Category

APPOINTMENT ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

01st June 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

ARVIND KUMAR

Adv. NARENDRA BALI

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C.

DIRECTOR

Adv. C.S.C.

ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR

Adv. C.S.C.

CHIEF EDUCATION OFFICER

Adv. C.S.C.

DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER

Adv. C.S.C.

Orders

01-06-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Summary of WPSS/1428/2026 The High Court of Uttarakhand directed the District Education Officer (Primary Education), Dehradun, to convene a committee meeting within 15 days and decide on Arvind Kumar's selection for Assistant Teacher (Primary) under disability quota within a further 15 days by reasoned order. Kumar, a 53% disabled candidate who successfully completed counseling with no objections raised, had been awaiting results despite prior directorial instructions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of WPSS/1428/2026 The High Court of Uttarakhand directed the District Education Officer (Primary Education), Dehradun, to convene a committee meeting within 15 days and decide on Arvind Kumar's selection for Assistant Teacher (Primary) under disability quota within a further 15 days by reasoned order. Kumar, a 53% disabled candidate who successfully completed counseling with no objections raised, had been awaiting results despite prior directorial instructions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case