SUNIL KUMAR BARTHWAL vs STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH Advocate - ADDL C.S.C. (UP) — WPSS/1427/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

Next hearing 09-Jun-2026

CNR: UKHC010093132026

Filing Number

WPSS/4846/2026

Filing Date

29-May-2026

Registration No

WPSS/1427/2026

Registration Date

29-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )

Sub-Category

RETIREMENT BENIFITS ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUNIL KUMAR BARTHWAL

    Adv. B D PANDE,H C PATHAK,H C PATHAK, ,KHUSHI CHAUDHARY,SHWETA MEHRA,H C PATHAK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH Advocate - ADDL C.S.C. (UP)

  2. 2.MANAGING DIRECTOR

    Adv. ANIL KUMAR JOSHI

  3. 3.GENERAL MANAGER

    Adv. ANIL KUMAR JOSHI

Case History

  1. 09-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  3. 01-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

    Case Summary: WPSS 1427/2026 Petitioner Sunil Kumar Barthwal, a retired Accountant, challenged a charge-sheet dated 23.05.2023 served nearly two years after his retirement on 30.06.2021, contending no rules authorize proceedings against retired employees. The court adjourned the case, granting respondents (U.P. Rajkiya Nirman Nigam) one week to provide instructions on whether such rules exist, with listing scheduled for 09.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 29-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPSS/1427/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPSS 1427/2026 Petitioner Sunil Kumar Barthwal, a retired Accountant, challenged a charge-sheet dated 23.05.2023 served nearly two years after his retirement on 30.06.2021, contending no rules authorize proceedings against retired employees. The court adjourned the case, granting respondents (U.P. Rajkiya Nirman Nigam) one week to provide instructions on whether such rules exist, with listing scheduled for 09.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case