AJAY SINGH vs DISTRICT MAGISTRATE Advocate - C.S.C. — WPMS/1637/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 01st June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010093072026

Filing Number

WPMS/4843/2026

Filing Date

29-May-2026

Registration No

WPMS/1637/2026

Registration Date

29-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

MISC MATTERS ( 47 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

01-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AJAY SINGH

    Adv. M K RAY,MAHUA RAY,MAHUA RAY, ,TIJIL GANGWAR,HARSH TANEJA,MAHUA RAY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DISTRICT MAGISTRATE Advocate - C.S.C.

  2. 2.GENERAL MANAGER RAILWAY

    Adv. DEPUTY S.G.

  3. 3.REGIONAL MANAGER RAILWAY

    Adv. DEPUTY S.G.

  4. 4.SENIOR SECTION ENGINEER

    Adv. DEPUTY S.G.

  5. 5.ESTATE OFFICER

    Adv. DEPUTY S.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

    The court dismissed Ajay Singh's writ petition challenging railway eviction notices for unauthorized encroachment on railway land. The judge held that Singh failed to submit a reply to the show cause notice issued under the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971, and directed him to file a proper response to the Estate Officer within 7 days, allowing him an opportunity to present his case before administrative proceedings proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  4. 29-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPMS/1637/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed Ajay Singh's writ petition challenging railway eviction notices for unauthorized encroachment on railway land. The judge held that Singh failed to submit a reply to the show cause notice issued under the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971, and directed him to file a proper response to the Estate Officer within 7 days, allowing him an opportunity to present his case before administrative proceedings proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case