AJAY SINGH vs DISTRICT MAGISTRATE Advocate - C.S.C. — WPMS/1637/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 01st June 2026.

CNR: UKHC010093072026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WPMS/4843/2026

Filing Date

29-05-2026

Registration No

WPMS/1637/2026

Registration Date

29-05-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

MISC MATTERS ( 47 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

01st June 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

AJAY SINGH

Adv. M K RAY,MAHUA RAY,MAHUA RAY, ,TIJIL GANGWAR,HARSH TANEJA,MAHUA RAY

Respondent(s)

DISTRICT MAGISTRATE Advocate - C.S.C.

GENERAL MANAGER RAILWAY

Adv. DEPUTY S.G.

REGIONAL MANAGER RAILWAY

Adv. DEPUTY S.G.

SENIOR SECTION ENGINEER

Adv. DEPUTY S.G.

ESTATE OFFICER

Adv. DEPUTY S.G.

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

01-06-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

01-06-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

The court dismissed Ajay Singh's writ petition challenging railway eviction notices for unauthorized encroachment on railway land. The judge held that Singh failed to submit a reply to the show cause notice issued under the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971, and directed him to file a proper response to the Estate Officer within 7 days, allowing him an opportunity to present his case before administrative proceedings proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed Ajay Singh's writ petition challenging railway eviction notices for unauthorized encroachment on railway land. The judge held that Singh failed to submit a reply to the show cause notice issued under the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971, and directed him to file a proper response to the Estate Officer within 7 days, allowing him an opportunity to present his case before administrative proceedings proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case