BABITA DEVI vs DISTRICT MAGISTRATE Advocate - C.S.C. — WPMS/1632/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 01st June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010092962026

Filing Number

WPMS/4837/2026

Filing Date

29-May-2026

Registration No

WPMS/1632/2026

Registration Date

29-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

MISC MATTERS ( 47 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

01-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BABITA DEVI

    Adv. M K RAY,MAHUA RAY,MAHUA RAY, ,TIJIL GANGWAR,HARSH TANEJA,MAHUA RAY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DISTRICT MAGISTRATE Advocate - C.S.C.

  2. 2.GENERAL MANAGER RAILWAY

    Adv. DEPUTY S.G.

  3. 3.REGIONAL MANAGER RAILWAY

    Adv. DEPUTY S.G.

  4. 4.SENIOR SECTION ENGINEER

    Adv. DEPUTY S.G.

  5. 5.ESTATE OFFICER

    Adv. DEPUTY S.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

    Case Summary: WPMS No. 1632/2026 (Babita Devi v. District Magistrate & Railway Officials) The court disposed of the writ petition challenging Railway encroachment removal notices, finding the petitioner had not replied to the show cause notice issued under the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971. The court directed the petitioner to file a formal reply to the show cause notice within 7 days before the Estate Officer, rather than granting relief through the writ petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  4. 29-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPMS/1632/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPMS No. 1632/2026 (Babita Devi v. District Magistrate & Railway Officials) The court disposed of the writ petition challenging Railway encroachment removal notices, finding the petitioner had not replied to the show cause notice issued under the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971. The court directed the petitioner to file a formal reply to the show cause notice within 7 days before the Estate Officer, rather than granting relief through the writ petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case