RAJESH KUMAR vs DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL — WPMB/472/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 10th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010092922026

Filing Number

WPMS/4833/2026

Filing Date

29-May-2026

Registration No

WPMB/472/2026

Registration Date

29-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

AGAINST THE ORDER OF DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL ( 17 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

10-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJESH KUMAR

    Adv. RAVINDRA S RAWAT

  2. 2.NAVEEN KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

  2. 2.DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL

  3. 3.KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD

  4. 4.PUSHPENDRA KUMAR MISHRA

  5. 5.SHAINKI JAIN

    Adv. NIKHIL SINGHAL (FOR CAVEATOR)

  6. 6.VINOD KUMAR JAIN

    Adv. NIKHIL SINGHAL

  7. 7.NIRJA JAIN

    Adv. NIKHIL SINGHAL

  8. 8.PRADEEP CHANDAK

  9. 9.JAIDEEP CHANDAK

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash UpadhyayView PDF

    The High Court of Uttarakhand dismissed the writ petition challenging DRAT's rejection of petitioners' restoration application, holding that petitioners, who purchased a half-share in M/s Piyush Industries (a loan borrower), were liable to pay full court fees rather than half fees as third parties. However, the Court granted liberty to petitioners to file a fresh application before DRAT with evidence of full court fee payment for reconsideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases As Defective -236

    Registrar (Judicial)

  4. 29-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPMB/472/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Uttarakhand dismissed the writ petition challenging DRAT's rejection of petitioners' restoration application, holding that petitioners, who purchased a half-share in M/s Piyush Industries (a loan borrower), were liable to pay full court fees rather than half fees as third parties. However, the Court granted liberty to petitioners to file a fresh application before DRAT with evidence of full court fee payment for reconsideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case