MANOJ BHATT vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/1190/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 323,354. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: UKHC010092882026

Filing Number

C528/4458/2026

Filing Date

29-May-2026

Registration No

C528/1190/2026

Registration Date

29-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF OTHER COMPLAINT CASE ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 323,354

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANOJ BHATT

    Adv. ALOK KUMAR,MANISH LOHANI,MANISH LOHANI, ,MANISH LOHANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.SMT. MUNNI DEVI

  3. 3.SMT. BABLI DEVI

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 01-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF

    Case Summary: C528/1190/2026 Manoj Bhatt's petition to quash a summoning order in a complaint case alleging torture and forced signatures at a police station was partially allowed with interim relief. The court found merit in the applicant's submission that he was not present at the police station on the alleged incident date (12.02.2023), having taken charge only on 12.04.2023. The court stayed further proceedings against the applicant till the next hearing and issued notice to respondents (Munni Devi, Babli Devi, and State of Uttarakhand) returnable within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

  4. 29-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. C528/1190/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C528/1190/2026 Manoj Bhatt's petition to quash a summoning order in a complaint case alleging torture and forced signatures at a police station was partially allowed with interim relief. The court found merit in the applicant's submission that he was not present at the police station on the alleged incident date (12.02.2023), having taken charge only on 12.04.2023. The court stayed further proceedings against the applicant till the next hearing and issued notice to respondents (Munni Devi, Babli Devi, and State of Uttarakhand) returnable within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case