RAJENDRA SINGH DEV vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C. — WPSS/1424/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 01st June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010092872026

Filing Number

WPSS/4829/2026

Filing Date

29-May-2026

Registration No

WPSS/1424/2026

Registration Date

29-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )

Sub-Category

RELATING TO PAY AND ALLOWANCES ( 17 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

01-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJENDRA SINGH DEV

    Adv. MANISH LOHANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C.

  2. 2.HEAD OF DEPARTMENT

  3. 3.PRESIDING OFFICER

  4. 4.CHIEF PROJECT OFFICER

    Adv. NEERAJ GARG

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

    Case Summary: The High Court of Uttarakhand dismissed Rajendra Singh Dev's writ petition challenging the termination of his appointment as Junior Assistant at Labour Court, Kashipur. The court found no illegality in the order ending his service, noting that his initial appointment was made without prior state government permission as required by Government Order No.379/XXX(2)/2018 dated 29.10.2021, making the non-extension of his contract lawful. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPSS/1424/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Uttarakhand dismissed Rajendra Singh Dev's writ petition challenging the termination of his appointment as Junior Assistant at Labour Court, Kashipur. The court found no illegality in the order ending his service, noting that his initial appointment was made without prior state government permission as required by Government Order No.379/XXX(2)/2018 dated 29.10.2021, making the non-extension of his contract lawful. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case