DULAL GHOSH vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — BA1/943/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 65(1),137(2),87. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
CNR: UKHC010092842026
Filing Number
BA1/4456/2026
Filing Date
29-May-2026
Registration No
BA1/943/2026
Registration Date
29-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DULAL GHOSH
Adv. PIYUSH SHRIVASTAV,VARSHA,VARSHA, ,VARSHA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
Case History
-
17-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Jun-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
-
01-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF
Case Summary: BA1/943/2026 - Dulal Ghosh v. State of Uttarakhand Dulal Ghosh's bail application in a sexual offence case involving a 14-year-old victim was adjourned. The applicant claimed false implication and presented negative DNA results, while the State argued the victim was taken from parental guardianship. The court granted the State two weeks to file objections/counter affidavit and scheduled the case for hearing on 17.06.2026. No bail decision was rendered at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. BA1/943/2026
Case Summary: BA1/943/2026 - Dulal Ghosh v. State of Uttarakhand Dulal Ghosh's bail application in a sexual offence case involving a 14-year-old victim was adjourned. The applicant claimed false implication and presented negative DNA results, while the State argued the victim was taken from parental guardianship. The court granted the State two weeks to file objections/counter affidavit and scheduled the case for hearing on 17.06.2026. No bail decision was rendered at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts