KULDEEP NANDRAJOG vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/1184/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 120B,420. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: UKHC010092732026

Filing Number

C528/4448/2026

Filing Date

29-May-2026

Registration No

C528/1184/2026

Registration Date

29-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF POLICE CHALLANI CASES ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 120B,420

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KULDEEP NANDRAJOG

    Adv. SHARANG DHULIA

  2. 2.ANJALI TYAGI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.MR. RAJVEER SINGH

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 01-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF

    SUMMARY: The High Court of Uttarakhand granted a stay of criminal proceedings against applicants Kuldeep Nandrajog and Anjali Tyagi in a real estate dispute involving Octagon Builders. The court held that the dispute arises from a commercial contract with an arbitration clause and should not have been criminally prosecuted without a mandatory preliminary inquiry. The court stayed further proceedings in Criminal Case No.595 of 2025 pending before the Judicial Magistrate, Haridwar, pending resolution of the present petition, and issued notice to the complainant for next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

  4. 29-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. C528/1184/2026

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The High Court of Uttarakhand granted a stay of criminal proceedings against applicants Kuldeep Nandrajog and Anjali Tyagi in a real estate dispute involving Octagon Builders. The court held that the dispute arises from a commercial contract with an arbitration clause and should not have been criminally prosecuted without a mandatory preliminary inquiry. The court stayed further proceedings in Criminal Case No.595 of 2025 pending before the Judicial Magistrate, Haridwar, pending resolution of the present petition, and issued notice to the complainant for next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case