KULDEEP NANDRAJOG vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/1185/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 120B,420. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: UKHC010092712026
Next Hearing
: -
Filing Number
C528/4447/2026
Filing Date
29-05-2026
Registration No
C528/1185/2026
Registration Date
29-05-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF POLICE CHALLANI CASES ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KULDEEP NANDRAJOG
Adv. SHARANG DHULIA
ANJALI TYAGI
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
SMT. MADHU SHARMA
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-06-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
Orders
Case Summary: C528/1185/2026 Outcome: The court stayed further criminal proceedings and issued notice to the complainant. The case was adjourned for next hearing after service report, with stay application granted. Details: Kuldeep Nandrajog and Anjali Tyagi challenged cognizance taken in a property dispute involving Octagon Builders' housing scheme. The applicants argued the dispute is contractual (governed by arbitration clause in agreement), not criminal; the company is liquidated; and no preliminary inquiry was conducted before FIR registration as mandated by Supreme Court precedent. Hon'ble Justice Alok Mahra directed that Criminal Case No.619 of 2025 before the Haridwar Magistrate remain stayed pending further hearing, and asked the complainant to file counter-affidavit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: C528/1185/2026 Outcome: The court stayed further criminal proceedings and issued notice to the complainant. The case was adjourned for next hearing after service report, with stay application granted. Details: Kuldeep Nandrajog and Anjali Tyagi challenged cognizance taken in a property dispute involving Octagon Builders' housing scheme. The applicants argued the dispute is contractual (governed by arbitration clause in agreement), not criminal; the company is liquidated; and no preliminary inquiry was conducted before FIR registration as mandated by Supreme Court precedent. Hon'ble Justice Alok Mahra directed that Criminal Case No.619 of 2025 before the Haridwar Magistrate remain stayed pending further hearing, and asked the complainant to file counter-affidavit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts