KULDEEP NANDRAJOG vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/1176/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 120B,420. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: UKHC010092642026

Next Hearing

: -

Filing Number

C528/4441/2026

Filing Date

29-05-2026

Registration No

C528/1176/2026

Registration Date

29-05-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF POLICE CHALLANI CASES ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 120B,420

Petitioner(s)

KULDEEP NANDRAJOG

Adv. SHARANG DHULIA

ANJALI TYAGI

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

MRS. REETA TYAGI

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

01-06-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

01-06-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Case Summary: The court issued a stay on criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 624 of 2025) against applicants Kuldeep Nandrajog and Anjali Tyagi in a real estate dispute involving non-delivery of a plot booked through Octagon Builders. The court found the dispute to be contractual in nature governed by an arbitration clause, noted the company is in liquidation, and held that no preliminary inquiry was conducted before FIR registration as mandated by law. Notice was issued to respondent (Mrs. Reeta Tyagi), with the matter listed for further hearing after service reports are received. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The court issued a stay on criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 624 of 2025) against applicants Kuldeep Nandrajog and Anjali Tyagi in a real estate dispute involving non-delivery of a plot booked through Octagon Builders. The court found the dispute to be contractual in nature governed by an arbitration clause, noted the company is in liquidation, and held that no preliminary inquiry was conducted before FIR registration as mandated by law. Notice was issued to respondent (Mrs. Reeta Tyagi), with the matter listed for further hearing after service reports are received. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case