KULDEEP NANDRAJOG vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/1178/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 120B,420. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: UKHC010092622026

Filing Number

C528/4439/2026

Filing Date

29-May-2026

Registration No

C528/1178/2026

Registration Date

29-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF POLICE CHALLANI CASES ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 120B,420

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KULDEEP NANDRAJOG

    Adv. SHARANG DHULIA

  2. 2.ANJALI TYAGI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.MR. DHARMESH KUMAR BAJAJ

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 01-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF

    Summary: C528/1178/2026 The court issued notice to the respondent and stayed further proceedings in the underlying criminal case (Criminal Case No. 647 of 2025) pending before the Haridwar Magistrate. The applicants challenged cognizance taken in a real estate dispute involving a housing scheme, arguing the matter is contractual (governed by an arbitration clause and contractual remedies) rather than criminal, and that no preliminary inquiry was conducted before FIR registration as required by law. The case is listed for next hearing after service report is received. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

  4. 29-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. C528/1178/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: C528/1178/2026 The court issued notice to the respondent and stayed further proceedings in the underlying criminal case (Criminal Case No. 647 of 2025) pending before the Haridwar Magistrate. The applicants challenged cognizance taken in a real estate dispute involving a housing scheme, arguing the matter is contractual (governed by an arbitration clause and contractual remedies) rather than criminal, and that no preliminary inquiry was conducted before FIR registration as required by law. The case is listed for next hearing after service report is received. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case