KULDEEP NANDRAJOG vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/1179/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 120B,420. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: UKHC010092612026

Filing Number

C528/4438/2026

Filing Date

29-May-2026

Registration No

C528/1179/2026

Registration Date

29-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF POLICE CHALLANI CASES ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 120B,420

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KULDEEP NANDRAJOG

    Adv. SHARANG DHULIA

  2. 2.ANJALI TYAGI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.MR. MANOJ KUMAR

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 01-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF

    Case Summary: C528/1179/2026 Kuldeep Nandrajog and Anjali Tyagi v. State of Uttarakhand The court issued a notice and stayed further criminal proceedings. An FIR was lodged against the applicants regarding a real estate dispute over a plot in a housing scheme where the complainant alleged non-delivery of possession and sale deed. The applicants argued the dispute is contractual (governed by an arbitration clause), that the builder company is already in liquidation, and that no preliminary inquiry was conducted before FIR registration as required. Justice Alok Mahra directed that criminal proceedings before the Haridwar Magistrate remain stayed pending the next hearing and disposed of the stay application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

  4. 29-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. C528/1179/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C528/1179/2026 Kuldeep Nandrajog and Anjali Tyagi v. State of Uttarakhand The court issued a notice and stayed further criminal proceedings. An FIR was lodged against the applicants regarding a real estate dispute over a plot in a housing scheme where the complainant alleged non-delivery of possession and sale deed. The applicants argued the dispute is contractual (governed by an arbitration clause), that the builder company is already in liquidation, and that no preliminary inquiry was conducted before FIR registration as required. Justice Alok Mahra directed that criminal proceedings before the Haridwar Magistrate remain stayed pending the next hearing and disposed of the stay application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case