KULDEEP NANDRAJOG vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/1179/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 120B,420. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: UKHC010092612026
Next Hearing
: -
Filing Number
C528/4438/2026
Filing Date
29-05-2026
Registration No
C528/1179/2026
Registration Date
29-05-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF POLICE CHALLANI CASES ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KULDEEP NANDRAJOG
Adv. SHARANG DHULIA
ANJALI TYAGI
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
MR. MANOJ KUMAR
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-06-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
Orders
Case Summary: C528/1179/2026 Kuldeep Nandrajog and Anjali Tyagi v. State of Uttarakhand The court issued a notice and stayed further criminal proceedings. An FIR was lodged against the applicants regarding a real estate dispute over a plot in a housing scheme where the complainant alleged non-delivery of possession and sale deed. The applicants argued the dispute is contractual (governed by an arbitration clause), that the builder company is already in liquidation, and that no preliminary inquiry was conducted before FIR registration as required. Justice Alok Mahra directed that criminal proceedings before the Haridwar Magistrate remain stayed pending the next hearing and disposed of the stay application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: C528/1179/2026 Kuldeep Nandrajog and Anjali Tyagi v. State of Uttarakhand The court issued a notice and stayed further criminal proceedings. An FIR was lodged against the applicants regarding a real estate dispute over a plot in a housing scheme where the complainant alleged non-delivery of possession and sale deed. The applicants argued the dispute is contractual (governed by an arbitration clause), that the builder company is already in liquidation, and that no preliminary inquiry was conducted before FIR registration as required. Justice Alok Mahra directed that criminal proceedings before the Haridwar Magistrate remain stayed pending the next hearing and disposed of the stay application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts