KULDEEP NANDRAJOG vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/1180/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 120B,420,427. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: UKHC010092602026

Filing Number

C528/4437/2026

Filing Date

29-May-2026

Registration No

C528/1180/2026

Registration Date

29-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF POLICE CHALLANI CASES ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 120B,420,427

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KULDEEP NANDRAJOG

    Adv. SHARANG DHULIA

  2. 2.ANJALI TYAGI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.MRS. MADHU SINGH

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 01-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF

    Case Summary: C528/1180/2026 Outcome: Case adjourned with stay of proceedings granted. The court stayed further criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 645 of 2025) against applicants Kuldeep Nandrajog and Anjali Tyagi pending before the Haridwar Magistrate. The applicants challenged cognizance taken in an FIR regarding non-delivery of a plot in a housing scheme, arguing the dispute is contractual (covered by arbitration clause), no preliminary inquiry was conducted as required by law, and the company has been liquidated since 2018 placing assets under Official Liquidator control. The court issued notice to the complainant returnable at an early date and listed the matter after service report receipt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

  4. 29-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. C528/1180/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C528/1180/2026 Outcome: Case adjourned with stay of proceedings granted. The court stayed further criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 645 of 2025) against applicants Kuldeep Nandrajog and Anjali Tyagi pending before the Haridwar Magistrate. The applicants challenged cognizance taken in an FIR regarding non-delivery of a plot in a housing scheme, arguing the dispute is contractual (covered by arbitration clause), no preliminary inquiry was conducted as required by law, and the company has been liquidated since 2018 placing assets under Official Liquidator control. The court issued notice to the complainant returnable at an early date and listed the matter after service report receipt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case