BETALESHWAR MAHADEV STONE CRUSHER vs THE NAINITAL BANK LTD — WPMS/1625/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 01st June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010092582026

Filing Number

WPMS/4821/2026

Filing Date

29-May-2026

Registration No

WPMS/1625/2026

Registration Date

29-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

MISC MATTERS ( 47 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

01-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BETALESHWAR MAHADEV STONE CRUSHER

    Adv. DHARMENDRA BARTHWAL,TRIBHUWAN SINGH PHARTIYAL,TRIBHUWAN SINGH PHARTIYAL, ,TRIBHUWAN SINGH PHARTIYAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE NAINITAL BANK LTD

  2. 2.ASSOCIATE VICE PRESIDENT

    Adv. A K JOSHI

  3. 3.BRANCH MANAGER THE NAINITAL BANK LTD

    Adv. A K JOSHI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

    The High Court of Uttarakhand disposed of the writ petition by allowing the petitioner stone crusher to settle its outstanding loan of Rs.1,02,73,499.22 through a structured payment plan: Rs.25 lakhs within 7 days, followed by four quarterly installments of Rs.19,43,374.80 each by June 2027. The court accepted the bank's consent to this arrangement, with a default clause allowing the bank to recover the entire balance immediately if any installment is missed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  4. 29-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPMS/1625/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Uttarakhand disposed of the writ petition by allowing the petitioner stone crusher to settle its outstanding loan of Rs.1,02,73,499.22 through a structured payment plan: Rs.25 lakhs within 7 days, followed by four quarterly installments of Rs.19,43,374.80 each by June 2027. The court accepted the bank's consent to this arrangement, with a default clause allowing the bank to recover the entire balance immediately if any installment is missed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case