ASHOK KUMAR KAMBOJ vs UTTARAKHAND TRANSPORT CORPORATION Advocate - LALIT SAMANT — WPSS/1433/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 01st June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010092562026

Filing Number

WPSS/4819/2026

Filing Date

29-May-2026

Registration No

WPSS/1433/2026

Registration Date

29-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )

Sub-Category

RETIREMENT BENEFITS ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

01-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHOK KUMAR KAMBOJ

    Adv. M C PANT,ABHISHEK PANT,ABHISHEK PANT, ,TULIKA SHARMA,ANUPRIYA KUKRETI,ABHISHEK PANT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UTTARAKHAND TRANSPORT CORPORATION Advocate - LALIT SAMANT

  2. 2.ASST MANAGING DIRECTOR

    Adv. LALIT SAMANT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

    Summary: The court allowed Ashok Kumar Kamboj's writ petition challenging the Uttarakhand Transport Corporation's order dated 05.05.2026 that recovered amounts from his leave encashment. The court found the matter was already settled by binding precedent judgments (14.06.2022 and affirmed 04.04.2024) and allowed the petition in accordance with those earlier rulings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPSS/1433/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court allowed Ashok Kumar Kamboj's writ petition challenging the Uttarakhand Transport Corporation's order dated 05.05.2026 that recovered amounts from his leave encashment. The court found the matter was already settled by binding precedent judgments (14.06.2022 and affirmed 04.04.2024) and allowed the petition in accordance with those earlier rulings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case