NANDAN LAL vs MANAGING DIRECTOR UTTARAKHAND TRANSPORT CORPORATION Advocate - ASHISH JOSHI — WPSS/1421/2026
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 01st June 2026.
CNR: UKHC010092552026
Filing Number
WPSS/4818/2026
Filing Date
29-May-2026
Registration No
WPSS/1421/2026
Registration Date
29-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )
Sub-Category
RETIREMENT BENEFITS ( 15 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
01-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NANDAN LAL
Adv. TARUN PRAKASH SINGH TAKULI,MEENAKSHI BHAKUNI,MEENAKSHI BHAKUNI, ,MEENAKSHI BHAKUNI
Respondent(s)
-
1.MANAGING DIRECTOR UTTARAKHAND TRANSPORT CORPORATION Advocate - ASHISH JOSHI
-
2.GENERAL MANAGER
Adv. ASHISH JOSHI
-
3.ASSITANT GENERAL MANAGER
Adv. ASHISH JOSHI
-
4.FINANCE CONTROLLER
Adv. ASHISH JOSHI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF
Summary: The court allowed Nandan Lal's writ petition challenging the deduction of ₹78,109 from his gratuity by Uttarakhand Transport Corporation on grounds of excess ACP/Pay. The court found the matter was conclusively settled by prior binding precedent (Balam Singh Aswal case, 2022), affirmed by Division Bench in 2024, and directed petitioner's case to be governed by those earlier judgments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPSS/1421/2026
Summary: The court allowed Nandan Lal's writ petition challenging the deduction of ₹78,109 from his gratuity by Uttarakhand Transport Corporation on grounds of excess ACP/Pay. The court found the matter was conclusively settled by prior binding precedent (Balam Singh Aswal case, 2022), affirmed by Division Bench in 2024, and directed petitioner's case to be governed by those earlier judgments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts