NANDAN LAL vs MANAGING DIRECTOR UTTARAKHAND TRANSPORT CORPORATION Advocate - ASHISH JOSHI — WPSS/1421/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 01st June 2026.

CNR: UKHC010092552026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WPSS/4818/2026

Filing Date

29-05-2026

Registration No

WPSS/1421/2026

Registration Date

29-05-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )

Sub-Category

RETIREMENT BENEFITS ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

01st June 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

NANDAN LAL

Adv. TARUN PRAKASH SINGH TAKULI,MEENAKSHI BHAKUNI,MEENAKSHI BHAKUNI, ,MEENAKSHI BHAKUNI

Respondent(s)

MANAGING DIRECTOR UTTARAKHAND TRANSPORT CORPORATION Advocate - ASHISH JOSHI

GENERAL MANAGER

Adv. ASHISH JOSHI

ASSITANT GENERAL MANAGER

Adv. ASHISH JOSHI

FINANCE CONTROLLER

Adv. ASHISH JOSHI

Orders

01-06-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Summary: The court allowed Nandan Lal's writ petition challenging the deduction of ₹78,109 from his gratuity by Uttarakhand Transport Corporation on grounds of excess ACP/Pay. The court found the matter was conclusively settled by prior binding precedent (Balam Singh Aswal case, 2022), affirmed by Division Bench in 2024, and directed petitioner's case to be governed by those earlier judgments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court allowed Nandan Lal's writ petition challenging the deduction of ₹78,109 from his gratuity by Uttarakhand Transport Corporation on grounds of excess ACP/Pay. The court found the matter was conclusively settled by prior binding precedent (Balam Singh Aswal case, 2022), affirmed by Division Bench in 2024, and directed petitioner's case to be governed by those earlier judgments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case