ICICI HOME FINANCE COMPANY LTD vs 5TH ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE — WPMS/1622/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 30th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010092442026

Filing Number

WPMS/4811/2026

Filing Date

27-May-2026

Registration No

WPMS/1622/2026

Registration Date

27-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

MISC MATTERS ( 47 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

30-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ICICI HOME FINANCE COMPANY LTD

    Adv. SURYAKANT MAITHANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.5TH ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE

  2. 2.WAZID ALI

  3. 3.BHOORI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

    The High Court of Uttarakhand granted ICICI Home Finance's writ petition seeking expedited resolution of its SARFAESI Act Section 14 application for possession of a secured asset. The court found that the application, pending since December 20, 2025, had exceeded statutory timelines and directed the Chief Judicial Magistrate to decide the matter within 30 days in compliance with SARFAESI Act provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-May-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  4. 27-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPMS/1622/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Uttarakhand granted ICICI Home Finance's writ petition seeking expedited resolution of its SARFAESI Act Section 14 application for possession of a secured asset. The court found that the application, pending since December 20, 2025, had exceeded statutory timelines and directed the Chief Judicial Magistrate to decide the matter within 30 days in compliance with SARFAESI Act provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case