ICICI HOME FINANCE CO LTD vs 1ST ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE DEHRADUN — WPMS/1619/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 30th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010092422026

Filing Number

WPMS/4809/2026

Filing Date

27-May-2026

Registration No

WPMS/1619/2026

Registration Date

27-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

MISC MATTERS ( 47 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

30-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ICICI HOME FINANCE CO LTD

    Adv. SURYAKANT MAITHANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.1ST ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE DEHRADUN

  2. 2.MS SONIA JAITLEY

  3. 3.NAVEEN KUMAR KANOJIA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

    Case Summary: WPMS/1619/2026 The High Court of Uttarakhand granted ICICI Home Finance's writ petition and directed the 1st Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Dehradun to decide a pending SARFAESI Act Section 14 application (Complaint Case No. 116 of 2026) within 30 days. The court found that the application, filed on 26.02.2026 for possession of secured assets, had remained undecided in violation of statutory timelines under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, which mandates decisions within 30-60 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-May-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  4. 27-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPMS/1619/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPMS/1619/2026 The High Court of Uttarakhand granted ICICI Home Finance's writ petition and directed the 1st Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Dehradun to decide a pending SARFAESI Act Section 14 application (Complaint Case No. 116 of 2026) within 30 days. The court found that the application, filed on 26.02.2026 for possession of secured assets, had remained undecided in violation of statutory timelines under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, which mandates decisions within 30-60 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case