ICICI HOME FINANCE CO LTD vs 1ST ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE DEHRADUN — WPMS/1619/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 30th May 2026.

CNR: UKHC010092422026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WPMS/4809/2026

Filing Date

27-05-2026

Registration No

WPMS/1619/2026

Registration Date

27-05-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

MISC MATTERS ( 47 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

30th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

ICICI HOME FINANCE CO LTD

Adv. SURYAKANT MAITHANI

Respondent(s)

1ST ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE DEHRADUN

MS SONIA JAITLEY

NAVEEN KUMAR KANOJIA

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

30-05-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

30-05-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Case Summary: WPMS/1619/2026 The High Court of Uttarakhand granted ICICI Home Finance's writ petition and directed the 1st Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Dehradun to decide a pending SARFAESI Act Section 14 application (Complaint Case No. 116 of 2026) within 30 days. The court found that the application, filed on 26.02.2026 for possession of secured assets, had remained undecided in violation of statutory timelines under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, which mandates decisions within 30-60 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPMS/1619/2026 The High Court of Uttarakhand granted ICICI Home Finance's writ petition and directed the 1st Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Dehradun to decide a pending SARFAESI Act Section 14 application (Complaint Case No. 116 of 2026) within 30 days. The court found that the application, filed on 26.02.2026 for possession of secured assets, had remained undecided in violation of statutory timelines under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, which mandates decisions within 30-60 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case