NASEEM AHMED vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — WPSS/1420/2026
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: UKHC010092372026
Filing Number
WPSS/4805/2026
Filing Date
27-May-2026
Registration No
WPSS/1420/2026
Registration Date
27-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )
Sub-Category
APPOINTMENT ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NASEEM AHMED
Adv. VINAY KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
-
2.DIRECTOR
Adv. C.S.C.
-
3.DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER
Adv. C.S.C.
-
4.DEPUTY EDUCATION OFFICER
Adv. C.S.C.
-
5.NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF OPEN SCHOOLING NIOS
Adv. YOGESH KUMAR PACHOLIA
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
15-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF
Case Summary: WPSS No.1420/2026 - Naseem Ahmed v. State of Uttarakhand The court granted an interim stay on the termination orders dated 25.04.2026 and 04.05.2026 against Assistant Teacher (Urdu) Naseem Ahmed, finding substance in petitioner's argument that NCTE's 2019 notification exempts candidates who completed B.Ed. before 29.07.2011 from the 45% graduation marks requirement (petitioner completed studies in 2000-2004). The court found the State's counter-argument regarding Urdu subject eligibility unacceptable as unsupported by the original termination order. Case adjourned with respondents directed to file counter-affidavit within six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-May-2026
Fresh Cases As Defective -236
Registrar (Judicial)
-
27-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPSS/1420/2026
Case Summary: WPSS No.1420/2026 - Naseem Ahmed v. State of Uttarakhand The court granted an interim stay on the termination orders dated 25.04.2026 and 04.05.2026 against Assistant Teacher (Urdu) Naseem Ahmed, finding substance in petitioner's argument that NCTE's 2019 notification exempts candidates who completed B.Ed. before 29.07.2011 from the 45% graduation marks requirement (petitioner completed studies in 2000-2004). The court found the State's counter-argument regarding Urdu subject eligibility unacceptable as unsupported by the original termination order. Case adjourned with respondents directed to file counter-affidavit within six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts