PRATIBHA RAWAT vs K S FARSWAN — CLCON/312/2026

Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (Act No. 70 of 1971) Section 12. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

Next hearing 16-Jun-2026

CNR: UKHC010092332026

Filing Number

CLCON/4803/2026

Filing Date

27-May-2026

Registration No

CLCON/312/2026

Registration Date

27-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CONTEMPT ( 6 )

Sub-Category

AGAINST FINAL ORDER ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (Act No. 70 of 1971) Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRATIBHA RAWAT

    Adv. SANDEEP KOTHARI,RUCHIKA NEGI,RUCHIKA NEGI, ,RUCHIKA NEGI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.K S FARSWAN

Case History

  1. 16-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Personal Appearance -4

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

    Case Summary: CLCON/312/2026 In this contempt of court case, the court rejected respondent K.S. Farswan's argument that he could not comply with the court's order dated 12.02.2026 because a Special Appeal had been filed, finding no interim stay order existed. Farswan made an undertaking to comply with the original order. The case was adjourned to 16.06.2026 with Farswan required to appear virtually. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 10-Jun-2026

    Personal Appearance -4

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

  5. 03-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh ThapliyalView PDF

  6. 03-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

  7. 30-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh ThapliyalView PDF

  8. 30-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 27-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CLCON/312/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CLCON/312/2026 In this contempt of court case, the court rejected respondent K.S. Farswan's argument that he could not comply with the court's order dated 12.02.2026 because a Special Appeal had been filed, finding no interim stay order existed. Farswan made an undertaking to comply with the original order. The case was adjourned to 16.06.2026 with Farswan required to appear virtually. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case