ASHISH SAINI vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C. — WPMS/1616/2026
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 17th June 2026.
CNR: UKHC010092172026
Filing Number
WPMS/4797/2026
Filing Date
27-May-2026
Registration No
WPMS/1616/2026
Registration Date
27-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )
Sub-Category
MISC MATTERS ( 47 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
17-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ASHISH SAINI
Adv. PRAKASH CHANDRA,NEHA RANI,NEHA RANI, ,NEHA RANI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C.
-
2.POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION OF UTTARAKHAND PITCUL
Adv. ARUSHI BATRA
-
3.UTTARAKHAND JAL VIDHYUT NIGAM LIMITED
Adv. VINAY KUMAR
-
4.UTTARAKHAND POWER CORPORATION LIMITED
Adv. DHARMENDRA BARTHWAL
-
5.PRAKASH CHANDRA DHYANI
-
6.SANDEEP SINGHAL
-
7.ANIL KUMAR YADAV
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
22-Jul-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -260
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari
-
17-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar TiwariView PDF
The Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the State of Uttarakhand to decide the petitioner's representation regarding alleged corruption, illegal appointments, and financial irregularities in power sector undertakings within six weeks, conditional upon the petitioner filing an affidavit in support of his complaint within one week. The Court did not grant the requested mandamus for a Special Investigation Team or court supervision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Jun-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -260
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari
-
30-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPMS/1616/2026
The Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the State of Uttarakhand to decide the petitioner's representation regarding alleged corruption, illegal appointments, and financial irregularities in power sector undertakings within six weeks, conditional upon the petitioner filing an affidavit in support of his complaint within one week. The Court did not grant the requested mandamus for a Special Investigation Team or court supervision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts