HARSHVARDHAN vs UTTARAKHAND AAYURVED UNIVERSITY Advocate - SANDEEP KOTHARI — WPMB/440/2026
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 30th May 2026.
CNR: UKHC010092032026
Filing Number
WPMS/4789/2026
Filing Date
27-05-2026
Registration No
WPMB/440/2026
Registration Date
27-05-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )
Sub-Category
MISC MATTERS ( 47 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
30th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HARSHVARDHAN
Adv. VIPUL SHARMA,NIVESH BAHUGUNA,NIVESH BAHUGUNA, ,KHUSHBOO TIWARI SHARMA,MANEESH BISHT,NIVESH BAHUGUNA
Respondent(s)
UTTARAKHAND AAYURVED UNIVERSITY Advocate - SANDEEP KOTHARI
VICE CHANCELLOR
Adv. SANDEEP KOTHARI
BEEHIVE AAYURVEDA MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-05-2026 | FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236 |
Orders
The High Court of Uttarakhand granted Harshvardhan's writ petition and directed the Vice-Chancellor of Uttarakhand Aayurveda University to consider and decide his representation for permission to re-sit the Panchakarma examination before the exam on 01.06.2026. The petitioner had failed the subject four times due to Anxiety Neurosis and Depression, and the court relied on Regulation 6(4)(d) of the Indian Medicine Central Council Regulations, 2016, which permits a Vice-Chancellor to grant an additional exam attempt in cases of serious personal illness or unavoidable circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Uttarakhand granted Harshvardhan's writ petition and directed the Vice-Chancellor of Uttarakhand Aayurveda University to consider and decide his representation for permission to re-sit the Panchakarma examination before the exam on 01.06.2026. The petitioner had failed the subject four times due to Anxiety Neurosis and Depression, and the court relied on Regulation 6(4)(d) of the Indian Medicine Central Council Regulations, 2016, which permits a Vice-Chancellor to grant an additional exam attempt in cases of serious personal illness or unavoidable circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts