HINDUSTAN ZINC LTD vs UNION OF INDIA Advocate - DEPUTY S.G., ,SAURAV ADHIKARI — WPMB/429/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: UKHC010091822026

Filing Number

WPMB/4777/2026

Filing Date

27-May-2026

Registration No

WPMB/429/2026

Registration Date

27-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

GOODS AND SERVICE TAX ACT ( 48 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HINDUSTAN ZINC LTD

    Adv. TARUN PANDE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA Advocate - DEPUTY S.G., ,SAURAV ADHIKARI

  2. 2.THE COMMISSIONER

    Adv. SHOBHIT SAHARIA

  3. 3.THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER

    Adv. SHOBHIT SAHARIA

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash UpadhyayView PDF

    Case Summary: WPMB 429/2026 The writ petition filed by Hindustan Zinc Ltd. against the Union of India and others was heard on 10.06.2026. The court granted two weeks' time to respondents 2 & 3 (represented by Sri Shobhit Saharia) to file their counter-affidavit. The case was adjourned and listed for hearing immediately after the counter-affidavit is filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-May-2026

    Fresh Cases As Defective -236

    Registrar (Judicial)

  4. 27-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPMB/429/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPMB 429/2026 The writ petition filed by Hindustan Zinc Ltd. against the Union of India and others was heard on 10.06.2026. The court granted two weeks' time to respondents 2 & 3 (represented by Sri Shobhit Saharia) to file their counter-affidavit. The case was adjourned and listed for hearing immediately after the counter-affidavit is filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case