RIPUL CHAUHAN vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — BA1/936/2026
Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (Act No. 61 of 1985) Section 8,22,29. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 30th May 2026.
CNR: UKHC010091702026
Filing Number
BA1/4394/2026
Filing Date
27-May-2026
Registration No
BA1/936/2026
Registration Date
27-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
30-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RIPUL CHAUHAN
Adv. KARAN SINGH DUGTAL,NEERAJ PARIHAR,NEERAJ PARIHAR, ,NEERAJ PARIHAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF
Case Summary: BA1/936/2026 - Ripul Chauhan v. State of Uttarakhand The Uttarakhand High Court granted bail to Ripul Chauhan, who was arrested in connection with narcotic drugs charges under the NDPS Act, 1985 and Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court found that Chauhan's case stood on identical footing with his co-accused Deepak Thakur, who had already been granted bail by the same court, and therefore allowed the bail application on the principle of parity, without expressing any opinion on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-May-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
-
27-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. BA1/936/2026
Case Summary: BA1/936/2026 - Ripul Chauhan v. State of Uttarakhand The Uttarakhand High Court granted bail to Ripul Chauhan, who was arrested in connection with narcotic drugs charges under the NDPS Act, 1985 and Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court found that Chauhan's case stood on identical footing with his co-accused Deepak Thakur, who had already been granted bail by the same court, and therefore allowed the bail application on the principle of parity, without expressing any opinion on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts