RAVI KUMAR vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — BA1/933/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),61(2),111. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

Next hearing 16-Jun-2026

CNR: UKHC010091632026

Filing Number

BA1/4390/2026

Filing Date

27-May-2026

Registration No

BA1/933/2026

Registration Date

27-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),61(2),111
Information Technology Act, 2000 (Act No. 21 of 2000) Section 66D

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAVI KUMAR

    Adv. GAURAV SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

Case History

  1. 16-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

  3. 30-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF

    Summary of BA1/933/2026 In a bail application by Ravi Kumar against the State of Uttarakhand, the court heard arguments on May 30, 2026. The applicant's counsel argued that while ATM cards and banking documents were recovered from him, the prosecution failed to establish any nexus to the alleged offence. The State countered that ten ATM cards, eight cheque books, and other banking documents were recovered, with approximately thirteen pending complaints against the applicant. The court adjourned the case to June 16, 2026, granting the State time to file a detailed counter-affidavit; no bail decision was rendered at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 30-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 27-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. BA1/933/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of BA1/933/2026 In a bail application by Ravi Kumar against the State of Uttarakhand, the court heard arguments on May 30, 2026. The applicant's counsel argued that while ATM cards and banking documents were recovered from him, the prosecution failed to establish any nexus to the alleged offence. The State countered that ten ATM cards, eight cheque books, and other banking documents were recovered, with approximately thirteen pending complaints against the applicant. The court adjourned the case to June 16, 2026, granting the State time to file a detailed counter-affidavit; no bail decision was rendered at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case