RAVI KUMAR vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — BA1/933/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),61(2),111. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
CNR: UKHC010091632026
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
Filing Number
BA1/4390/2026
Filing Date
27-05-2026
Registration No
BA1/933/2026
Registration Date
27-05-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAVI KUMAR
Adv. GAURAV SINGH
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-05-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
| 16-06-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
Orders
Summary of BA1/933/2026 In a bail application by Ravi Kumar against the State of Uttarakhand, the court heard arguments on May 30, 2026. The applicant's counsel argued that while ATM cards and banking documents were recovered from him, the prosecution failed to establish any nexus to the alleged offence. The State countered that ten ATM cards, eight cheque books, and other banking documents were recovered, with approximately thirteen pending complaints against the applicant. The court adjourned the case to June 16, 2026, granting the State time to file a detailed counter-affidavit; no bail decision was rendered at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of BA1/933/2026 In a bail application by Ravi Kumar against the State of Uttarakhand, the court heard arguments on May 30, 2026. The applicant's counsel argued that while ATM cards and banking documents were recovered from him, the prosecution failed to establish any nexus to the alleged offence. The State countered that ten ATM cards, eight cheque books, and other banking documents were recovered, with approximately thirteen pending complaints against the applicant. The court adjourned the case to June 16, 2026, granting the State time to file a detailed counter-affidavit; no bail decision was rendered at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts